| |
|
Warning
System – Issues
Nishantha Kamaladasa, Director, Centre for Housing Planning and
Building
Governance
It may not be necessary to have a centralized warning system
installed for all disasters. Met Dept could give warning about an
impending cyclone (which they did quite well in the last cyclone
as mentioned by Rohan), while the Irrigation Department could do
so with floods, as it is done right now. NBRO could be entrusted
the same with landslides and probably you may need to treat Tsunami
separately. The point here it is that a single institutional mechanism
may not be applicable to all disaster situations and also that those
which could be of local in nature, need to have local mechanisms.
Hence it is suggested that each disaster situation be taken separately
and under each disaster, separate mechanisms be created to detect
the disaster, decide the vulnerability and disseminate the warning
(Peterson’s stages).
Sustenance
Any external solution imposed on someone will not stay,
unless the solution has the blessings of the implementers. Hence
it would be necessary that institutions that are likely to implement
the warning system made a party in formulating the proposal.
For this to happen, you might need to consider appointing sub-committee
for each disaster and get representation from organizations that
are likely to get involve in the early warning system, in preparing
the solution, for each disaster separately.
Associated operations
Early warning requires mobilizing certain other sections in to the
area while removing vulnerable people. For example, police and army
might have to be moved to the area to combat looting, etc., Rescue
workers to help evacuation, etc. Hence warning system to work has
to address other than vulnerable groups with an agenda of action.
Set of values
It would be necessary that a set of values be adhered by
the people who get involve in disaster warnings, such as
| 1 |
Protecting
life would be the primary concern and all other concerns (political,
status, ownership, etc.) are secondary |
| 2 |
Selfless
commitment in discharging the duties |
| 3 |
etc
and etc |
It would be necessary to agree on the set of values necessary by
a team or you may even call for such through your web.
Indemnity
It is also necessary that people involve in the warning
system can exercise their duty without having to face consequences
later (law suits, etc.). Legislation needs to be formulated.
Apart from legal indemnity there should also be certain ethical
protection from media and other pressure groups in the event of
forecast become wrnong so that the credibility of the warning system
is not tarnished, unnecessarily.
Authority, Resources and facilities
The staff should also be provided with adequate resources
to make them self sufficient in their operations (necessary equipments,
finances, support staff, etc), access to the echelons of power,
authority to decide and act, etc. and etc.
Though these sounds too obvious these are serious constraints that
prevent officers from taking timely action, especially within the
bureaucracy.
|
|