| |
|
Geology of Earthquakes
L. R. K. Perera,
Head/Department of Geology,
University of Peradeniya,
Peradeniya.
|
1.
Earth and Its Active Interior
The earth’s interior has several compositional zones, namely,
the core (metallic solid), the outer core (liquid), the mantle (solid),
and the crust (solid) (Fig. 1). The continents and the ocean-floor
rocks represent the outer zone known as the crust. The continents
are made up of granitic (less dense) rocks and the ocean bottoms
are underlain by basaltic (dense) rocks. The crust and the upper
part of the mantle make rigid ‘plates’ of rock ‘floating’
on the lower mantle (Fig. 2). The plates or parts of plates are
identified as ‘continental’ or ‘oceanic’
based on the differences in their make-up mentioned above. Although
solid, the lower mantle rocks have the ability to ‘flow’
under the very hot conditions prevailing in the earth’s interior.
This hotter material in the lower mantle ‘flows’ up,
and down as it cools in a cycle (Fig. 3), like water in a boiling
kettle, but in a solid state. As the mantle flows, it drags, pushes,
and pulls apart the ‘plates’ of rock ‘floating’
on it. The moving ‘plates’ collide, slide pass one another,
or are pulled-apart to make new plates due to flow in the mantle.
The plate movements are very slow (5-10 cms/year) but are effective
for hundreds of million years. The theory of Plate Tectonics deals
with the plates and their movements.
|
2.
Plate Tectonics, Earthquakes, Volcanoes and Tsunamis
The theory of Plate Tectonics best explains earth’s
natural phenomena of very short duration, like earthquakes
and volcanism, and much longer duration processes like ocean
opening and closing, continental drift, and mountain building.
In fact, the theory reveals that the short duration phenomena
are offshoots of long duration processes that continue for
hundreds of million years due to plate movements.
The crust is made up of about a dozen Plates (Fig. 4). On
the basis of interaction between those during movement, three
kinds of plate boundaries have been identified.
(a) Convergent plate boundaries, (b) Divergent plate boundaries,
(c) transform fault boundaries (Fig. 5).
At convergent boundaries two continental plates, or two oceanic
plates, or an oceanic and a continental plate collide. During
the collision oceans gradually close, and heavier oceanic
plate sink into the mantle under the continental/oceanic plate.
Mountain ranges develop along the collision zone. Under the
severe pressure mounting on rocks during collision and sinking,
the blocks of rocks fracture and move relative one another
at depth generating earthquakes (Fig. 6). The most destructive
earthquakes occur at convergent plate boundaries. At much
great depths the sinking rocks melt and come out to the earth
surface as lava flowing out from volcanoes.
At divergent boundaries a continental plate splits into two
and move away from one another opening an ocean. Lava coming
out from the mantle solidifies to generate new oceanic crusts,
and at the same time pushing the continental fragments further
apart. Relative movement of blocks of rocks during widening
of the ocean leads to earthquakes but as not destructive as
at convergent plate boundaries.
Along transform fault boundaries continental or oceanic plates
of rocks slide pass one another (Fig. 7) and as a result of
friction earthquakes are generated but there is no volcanism.
One comparing the present-day plate boundaries with a world
seismicity map (Fig. 8) understands the relationship between
plate boundaries and earthquakes mentioned above. Notably,
there is a very high intensity of occurrence of earthquakes
around the margin of the Pacific Ocean. This is a convergent
plate boundary. In the middle of the Atlantic Ocean lies a
divergent plate boundary where there is lesser incidence of
earthquakes compared to that in the Pacific. Sri Lanka lies
in the middle of the Indo-Australian plate (Fig. 4) away from
the very high seismic zones, thus, is free from disastrous
earthquakes. But geo-scientists believe that a new plate boundary
has been developing in the Indian Ocean south of Sri Lanka
during the last eight (8) million years. Some less intense
earthquakes and minor tremors felt in Sri Lanka may be originating
in this newly developing seismic zone.
A tsunami is mainly generated by an under-sea earthquake whenever
there is a vertical, relative displacement between blocks
of rocks on the sea-floor. If the displacement is lateral
a tsunami will not be generated. Thus, tsunamis are not associated
with all under-sea earthquakes. |
| |
| 3.
Earthquakes and Seismic measurements |
An
earthquake releases a huge amount of energy in the form of
waves known as seismic waves. Three kinds of seismic waves
originate from the focus of an earthquake. (a) P-waves, (b)
S-waves, (c) surface waves. P and S waves are also known as
body waves as they travel through the body of the earth, whereas
the surface waves travel along the earth surface. It is the
latter waves that cause huge destruction to property during
an earthquake.
Geo-scientists record the earthquake waves on seismometers.
The three kinds of waves travel at different speeds and reach
a seismometer one after the other. By measuring the travel
time difference between P and S waves received by a given
seismometer and by measuring the amplitude of the wave, one
calculate the distance between the earthquake and the seismometer
and the magnitude of the earthquake in Ritcher scale. Seismic
wave data received from at least three such seismometers,
which are several hundred kilometers apart, is necessary to
locate the position of the earthquake. |
| |
| 4.
Seismic Monitoring Equipment (SME) in Peradeniya |
The
Government of Japan through JICA donated Seismic Monitoring
Equipment to the Department of Geology, University of Peradeniya
for teaching and research purposes. The system of equipment
was not intended to be serving as a Regional Seismic Monitoring
Center providing information on earthquakes to the general
public in Sri Lanka (in the manner Meteorology department
of Sri Lanka operates) or to the international community.
It can be developed to that capacity if and only if 24-hour,
365-day monitoring of seismicity in the region can be financially
supported to provide, (a) the man-power to run the system,
(b) maintenance cost of equipment, (c) licensing and updating
relevant computer software, (d) an uninterrupted power supply,
(e) maintenance of communication links to be used in emergencies
etc. Above all providing sufficient office space and security
for the system is a matter for concern. As at present Department
of Geology is overstretched with respect to its building requirements
and the seismic equipment is occupying a laboratory space
used by other scientific instruments accessed by both researchers
and students. This is not a good practice given the scientific
value of this equipment, and particularly if the authorities
expect future functioning of this equipment to serve the national
needs. However, this arrangement cannot be avoided as at present
due to problems of space. Similarly, components attached to
this system installed in other universities should to be protected
and given adequate security and the responsibility has to
be handed over to identified officials in those institutions.
The seismometers attached to this system are capable of receiving
seismic waves of regional and local earthquakes, after the
earthquakes have occurred. Four seismometers are stationed
at, Matara, Mihintale, Olluwil, and Peradeniya, within university
premises, to receive seismic signals. Any signals received
are channeled through telephone lines to the main station
at the Department of Geology, University of Peradeniya, where
the seismic data can be analysed. Analysis of the data will
reveal the location of the epicentre of an earthquake and
its magnitude.
It should be also mentioned that the seismic equipment donated
by the Government of Japan to the Department of Geology cannot
be used to predict earthquakes or tsunamis. Prediction of
an earthquake means revealing the location of the epicenter
of an earthquake, its intensity (magnitude in Richter Scale),
and time of occurrence in advance (see below). Even countries
like the United States of America possessing very high technological
capabilities, have not successfully predicted an earthquake,
even though zones of high seismicity (earthquake activity)
around the globe are very well known to the geo-scientists.
As mentioned above, tsunamis are generated mainly by earthquakes
beneath sea-floor and would be predictable if an earthquake
causing a vertical displacement of the sea-floor could be
predicted. Because earthquakes cannot be predicted tsunamis
are even more unpredictable. But centers like the Pacific
Ocean Tsunami Warning Centre can identify a tsunami in the
middle of the ocean, after it has been generated
by an earthquake, and warn the coastal communities
before it reaches the shore.
If Sri Lanka is to install a tsunami warning system in any
part of the Indian Ocean in the near future, the Seismic Monitoring
Equipment (SME) at Peradeniya is going to be of crucial significance
in assisting any Tsunami Monitoring and Warning exercise.
After an earthquake, Peradeniya SME will receive seismic signals
ahead of any indications of a tsunami on the Tsunami Monitoring
and Warning System (TMWS). Thus, TMWS can be on the look-out
for a tsunami more closely on their system of instruments.
Thus, Peradeniya SME should be made capable of raising an
alarm of a possible tsunami both manually and automatically
to the officials at the TMWS. Thus, any future TMWS in the
Indian Ocean will largely benefit from closely cooperating
with SME at Peradeniya. That will not only ensure efficient
functioning of the TMWS but that will enable them to make
accurate predictions and warnings on time. |
5. Earthquake prediction Earthquake
prediction research was initiated nearly 30 years ago in a
number of countries. First presumed precursors to subsequent
large and small earthquakes were studied with the hope that
these precursory phenomena would appear before many, if not
all, subsequent events. Among the phenomena considered were
things such as anomalies in the ratio of P-to S-wave velocities,
magnetic fields, resistivity, tilt, emission of noble gases.
Some of these hopes have either evaporated or have proved
extremely difficult to document. But even today new precursors,
such as, increase of the concentration of chlorine and other
ions in well waters before the Kobe earthquake, are added
to the list and some avenues of phenomenology have continued
to be pursued: clustering and anticlustering of earthquakes,
creep measurements, changes in the attenuation factor, paleoseismicity
methods, etc.
A second line pursued in prediction research was the presumption
that small earthquakes were scaled-down versions of large
ones, and hence the supposition was made that the study of
small earthquakes would reveal important truths about large
ones. This direction of research has also undergone modification
over the years. It was found that earthquake fractures take
place in a pre-stressed solid in which fluctuations are significant
perturbations of the uniformity of the stress field. But small
fractures take place in the shadows cast by the stress field
of the larger and the largest fractures. Also, the details
of the fracture and of the properties of nearby rocks are
not resolved observationally in smaller earthquakes, but is
clear in the case of large earthquakes. Thus, today the paradigms
have shifted to the study of strong earthquakes and away from
more numerous small earthquakes.
Earthquake prediction research has been divided into three
time intervals:
(i) short-term predictions - a day to a few hundred days before
a strong earthquake,
(ii) intermediate-term predictions - one year to one decade,
(iii) long-term predictions - longer than a decade before
great earthquakes.
Prospects for short-term prediction is rather low because
of its local nature: one would have to be fortunate to have
instruments within short range of the future focus of a strong
earthquake. Intermediate-term prediction research has centered
on identification of patterns of earthquake occurrence by
magnitude, time, and/or location prior to strong earthquakes.
Here too one relies on well-instrumented case histories of
precursory clustering and anti-clustering presumed to be associated
with future large earthquakes. On the long time scale, the
question that is asked is whether given faults, and especially
those that support the largest earthquakes, rupture periodically
or not. Here the evidence is derived from analysis of ancient
faulting episodes and the interaction between the geometry
of faults and the seismicity of the largest events. |
| |
| 6.
Educating the Public on Natural and Man-made Hazards |
The
national tragedy on 26th December 2004 has highlighted the
need to acquire public warning systems to face any such future
calamities. But if the public is not educated, prepared and
trained to respond to a warning, even the most sophisticated
systems may not deliver the expectations. Almost all natural,
accidental and man-made hazards may be identified if the first
signals can be sensed and given serious thought. That may
give sufficient time to alert everybody and take necessary
precautions to avoid casualties. Sometimes, vigilant and knowledgeable
public may raise the alarm of a danger before the warning
systems sound. Thus, it is vital to educate the public on
the causes, early signals, and dangers all kinds of natural,
accidental, and man-made hazards. That will give the leading
cutting edge to protect the public from any future danger
and build confidence in them to face any situation.
The kind and the scale of a hazard and those that would be
affected may depend on the circumstances. It could be an earthquake,
a tsunami, a landslide, a flood, a natural or man-made fire,
a poisonous gas leak/attack, thunder and lightning, micro-organism
related health hazard etc. Educating the public on these is
the responsibility of the university academics, scientists
of national research institutes, organisations and agencies.
The scientists of all these organisations should identify
the natural and man-made hazards coming under the purview
of their institutions. A collective effort must be made by
all the institutions to educate the general public with the
cooperation of all available expertise.
A National Hazard Monitoring and Mitigating Centre could co-ordinate
between different universities and national institutions cooperating
in such endeavour. The idea of having such centre is to facilitate
the flow of knowledge directly from expertise to the general
public. Provincial or divisional Hazard Educating Centres
could be the vehicle taking the knowledge to people at village
level. Personnel trained at postgraduate level and research
minded has to man Hazard Educating Centres around the country
to cater the public. They should be completely aware about
possible hazards a given area is likely to face and should
be able to delineate most hazard prone GS divisions that will
be first affected.
Thus, the government must be encouraged to initiate Provincial
or divisional Hazard Educating Centres closely co-operating
with administrative set-up (Provincial/ Divisional secretaries,
Pradeshiya Sabhas) to educate the public as well as to coordinate
action during any hazardous event. The mechanisms to be adopted
to educate the communities may range from hazard awareness
educational TV programmes, public seminars to programmes designed
for school children, preparing hand-outs and booklets to educate
the public, conducting frequent hazard responding drills,
and train personnel at postgraduate level to man Hazard Educating
Centres around the country. |
| |
| 7.
Evacuation and related problems |
The
coastal areas of Sri Lanka are densely populated and an evacuation
exercise during a tsunami for example requires movement of
large population to high ground during a short period of time.
It is reported that nearly 5 million people are living in
coastal areas affected by the recent tsunami. If the general
public is allowed to occupy the first 100 meters from the
shore, firm plans for evacuation should be put in place and
tested regularly, assuming that a tsunami will strike in the
middle of the night. Such plans can be facilitated and bring
the expected out come if, (i) an effective siren warning system
is erected and tested frequently in preparatory drills, (ii)
people in each and every household is taught which route to
take for safety during an evacuation. (iii) exit routes are
free from obstacles (eg. parked vehicles) and well lit at
the time of an evacuation.
One of the commonest problems arising during an evacuation
is the reluctant attitude of the general public to leave behind
their valuable house hold items. |
|
|