|
|
The Sri Lankan Parliament Select Committee to Recommend Steps to Minimize the Damages from Natural Disasters
The Mandate
When the tsunami hit people in Sri Lanka were not ready. In the light of the fact that the people of Sri Lanka were not prepared to face an event of this nature and the unpredictable and destructive nature of the tsunami event, on a motion moved in Parliament on 10.02.2005 the Parliament Select Committee consisting of 21 members from all political parties represented in Parliament was appointed with a mandate to:
Investigate whether there was a lack of preparedness to meet an emergency of the nature of the Tsunami that struck Sri Lanka on 26th December, 2004 and to recommend what steps should be taken to ensure that an early warning system be put in place and what other steps should be taken to minimize the damage caused by similar natural disaster’.
By unanimous choice of Parliament, Hon. Mahinda Samarasinghe, Chief opposition Whip of Parliament was appointed the Chairman of the Committee and the committee commenced its proceedings on February 11, 2005 and had 28 sittings up to the date of submitting this Report. The Committee heard the evidence of relevant personnel, went on field visits and participated in several local and foreign study tours.
Members of the Committee:
Hon. Mahinda Samarasinghe, MP
Chief Opposition Whip |
| Other Members
|
Hon. (Mrs.) Ferial Ismail Ashraff, MP
Minister of Housing and Construction Industry, Eastern Province Education and Irrigation Development |
Hon. Lakshman Kadirgamar, MP
Minister of Foreign Affairs |
Hon. Dinesh Gunawardena, MP
Minister of Urban Development and Water Supply |
Hon. D. E. W. Gunasekera, MP
Minister of Constitutional Reforms |
Hon. Douglas Devananda, MP
Minister of Agricultural Marketing Development, Co-operative Development, Hindu Affairs and Assisting Education and Vocational Training |
Hon. Jeyaraj Fernandopulle, MP
Minister of Trade, Commerce and Consumer Affairs |
henHon. (Prof.) Tissa Vitharana, MP
Minister of Science & Technology |
Hon. Mangala Samaraweera, MP
Minister of Ports & Aviation and Information & Media
Deputy Minister of Education |
Hon. Maithripala Sirisena, MP
Minister of Mahaweli and River Basin Development and Rajarata Development |
Hon. Muthu Sivalingam, MP
Minister of Estate Housing, Infrastructure and Community Development |
Hon. Bimal Rathnayaka, MP
Deputy Minister of Agriculture, Livestock, Land and Irrigation |
| Hon. Vajira Abeywardena, MP
|
| Hon. John Amaratunga, MP
|
| Hon. Mohamed Musthaffa, MP
|
| Ven. Athuraliye Rathana Thero, MP
|
| Hon. Sagala Ratnayaka, MP
|
| Hon. Nadarajah Raviraj, MP
|
| Hon. Mahinda Wijesekera, MP
|
| Hon. Rajavarothiam Sampanthan, MP
|
| Hon. Rauff Hakeem, MP
|
Secretary
Ms. Priyani Wijesekera
Secretary General, Sri Lanka Parliament |
By unanimous choice of Parliament, Hon. Mahinda Samarasinghe, Chief opposition Whip of Parliament was appointed the Chairman of the Committee.
This committee commenced its proceedings on February 11, 2005 and had 28 sittings up to the date of submitting this Report. The details of committee deliberations and presentations made are all uploaded on the committee website:
http://www.srilankanparliamentonnaturaldisasters.org . This is updated regularly.
Deliberations of the Select Committee, Local and Foreign Study Tours
The Committee heard the evidence of experts in the relevant fields, public officers, senior officers and commanders of the armed forces, Police and officers of the relevant government and private agencies; civil society organizations; and provincial, district and division authorities. The Committee also along with media personnel went on a field visit to the Geology Centre in the University of Peradeniya, the Pallekele Seismological Centre and Kuliatta, an identified landslide prone region in Kandy. The committee also visited the Tsunami-hit areas of Galle, Matara, Hambantota, Ampara districts and one of the worst affected areas of Kalmunai in Ampara district. The Committee Members also participated in several local and foreign study tours. The agencies represented, a list of those who made presentations and participated at the deliberations are appended at the end of this report. Some very important information gathered during foreign visits too is appended as appropriate.
These have been taken in to consideration in compiling the recommendations in this report.
This Committee wishes to place on record its appreciation of the valuable assistance rendered by the United Nations Development Programme, International Organization for Migration, Government of Australia and AUSAID, US State Department and the Governments of India, Italy, Japan, South Korea, Turkey, Germany and Indonesia.
The Committee in the course of deliberation agreed that the Parliament should appoint a Select Committee to examine and report on man-made disasters which the present Select Committee was unable to look into as a result of the Terms of Reference limiting its work to Natural Disasters. This should be followed up.
Foreword
Towards a “Safer Sri Lanka”
It has been my pleasure to chair this Select Committee constituted by the Sri Lankan Parliament to ‘investigate whether there was a lack of preparedness to meet an emergency of the nature of the Tsunami that struck Sri Lanka on December 26, 2004 and to recommend what steps should be taken to ensure that an early warning system be put in place and what other steps should be taken to minimize the damage caused by similar natural disasters’.
This Select Committee has adopted a truly bipartisan approach, consisting of senior ministers in the government and other senior members of parliament, who participated actively in the deliberations and study visits, despite their busy schedules. The proceedings of the various deliberations have been conducted in a very fair and impartial and constructive manner, leading to some very important recommendations.
I take this opportunity to thank the experts, officials, various organizations- government departments, universities, national/ international NGOs, media and various individuals too numerous to be named, for their valuable contributions in the proceedings of the select committee and for their submissions.
I also wish to acknowledge the invaluable support provided by various governments and international agencies for arranging eye-opening, invaluable study visits to different countries. Most of these countries visited have highly effective mechanisms for mitigating disasters and for reducing their impacts on lives and economy and the experiences from these study visits have contributed a lot towards the select committee’s recommendations.
I also wish to put on record the valuable contribution of the UNDP and IOM in supporting the committee with technical inputs and assisting the select committee with this report.
The Committee also wishes to express its sincere appreciation for the assistance and cooperation extended by the Parliament Staff.
It is also my sincere belief that since the recommendations have been arrived at, by consensus, and considering the bipartisan approach of the committee, any government would be in an excellent position to implement these recommendations towards a ‘safer Sri Lanka’
Mahinda Samarasinghe, MP
Chief Opposition Whip
Chairman- Sri Lankan Parliament Select Committee on Natural Disasters
| |
Contents |
|
| |
|
Pg. No. |
| |
Executive Summary
|
09-13
|
| |
Key Recommendations
|
14-19
|
| |
Acronyms and Abbreviations
|
20-21
|
| |
|
|
PART I - BACKGROUND AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK
Chapter 1 |
| 1 |
Background
|
23
|
| |
1.1 Tsunami of 26.12.2004 |
23 |
| |
1.2 The Geo-physical Perspective |
24 |
| |
Earthquakes
|
24 |
| |
Tsunamis
|
25 |
| |
1.3 Appointment of the Parliament Select Committee (PSC)
|
26 |
| |
1.4 Deliberations of the Select Committee, Local and Foreign
Study Tours
|
27-28 |
| |
|
|
| Chapter 2 |
| 2 |
Proposed National Mechanism for Disaster Risk Management
|
29 |
| |
2.1 Linkage with the disaster management bill
|
29-30 |
| |
2.2 Legal Powers of each level of Government – National,
Provincial, District, Divisional, Local and Village Levels
|
31 |
| |
2.3 Institutional framework at the national, provincial, district,
division, local and village levels
|
31 |
| |
-
Disaster Management Centre (DMC)
|
32 |
| |
-
Organizational Structure of DMC
|
33 |
| |
-
Multi-disciplinary approach
|
33-34 |
| |
2.4 Approach for Setting Up a National Disaster Risk
Management System |
35-37 |
| |
|
|
| PART II - ESTABLISHING THE NATIONAL DISASTER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM |
| |
Chapter 3 |
|
| 3 |
Systematic Multi-hazard Mapping Disaster Risk Assessment |
39 |
| |
3.1 Disasters Prevalent in Sri Lanka |
39 |
| |
3.2 Multi-hazard Mapping |
40 |
| |
- Hazard Information |
40 |
| |
- Hazard Mapping |
41 |
| |
3.3 Multiple Hazard Risks |
41-44 |
| |
3.4 Hazard Mapping and Risk Assessment Centre within DMC |
44 |
| |
3.5 Planning Multi-Hazard Disaster Risk Assessment |
45-46 |
| |
|
|
| Chapter 4 |
| 4 |
Systematic Data Collection, Research and Analysis |
47 |
| |
4.1 System for Disaster related Data Collection |
47 |
| |
4.1.1 Seismic Monitoring Equipment (SME) in
Peradeniya
|
47 |
| |
4.1.2 Seismic Monitoring Station at Pallekelle (PALK) |
48 |
| |
4.2 A National Data Collection Centre within the DMC |
48 |
| |
4.3 Research |
49 |
| |
4.4 Disaster Risk Information Systems & Inventory of
past disaster impacts
|
49-50 |
| |
4.5 DRM Website |
50 |
| |
|
|
| Chapter 5 |
| 5 |
Countrywide Disaster Early Warning System |
53 |
| |
5.1 Mechanism for Coordination and Working with Relevant
Early Warning Agencies – International, Regional and Local
|
53 |
| |
5.2 Capacities of Relevant Local Agencies |
53-54 |
| |
5.3 Early Warning Systems |
55 |
| |
- Early warning for weather related hazards
|
55 |
| |
- Early warning on riverine floods |
56 |
| |
- Early warning on possible flooding downstream of reservoirs |
57 |
| |
- Early warning on possible landslides |
58 |
| |
- Early warning on coastal flooding and storm surges |
58 |
| |
- For earthquakes and tsunamis/sea surges |
58-59 |
| |
5.4 Early Warning Dissemination Systems |
60-61 |
| |
|
|
| Chapter 6 |
| 6 |
Natural Disaster Mitigation Strategy for each level of Government
|
62 |
| |
6.1 Disaster Mitigation Strategies |
62-64 |
| |
6.2 Mitigation Approaches |
64-65 |
| |
6.3 Mitigation Planning and Implementation |
65-66 |
| |
|
|
| Chapter 7 |
| 7 |
Systems for integrating disaster risk concerns in development |
67 |
| |
7.1 Integrating DRM in the National Development Process |
67 |
| |
7.2 Activities required by programmes of UN Agencies |
68 |
| |
7.3 Codes and Guidelines for Planning and Construction in
Disaster Prone Areas
|
69 |
| |
7.4 Land Use Zoning Based on Hazard Maps |
70 |
| |
7.5 Coastal Area Buffer Zone for Post Tsunami Reconstruction |
71 |
| |
7.6 Data Base of Lands indicating proneness to various hazards |
72 |
| |
Development Controls by Different Agencies
|
73 |
| |
|
|
| Chapter 8 |
| 8 |
Natural Disaster Preparedness and Response Planning for each
Level of Government
|
74 |
| |
8.1 Disaster Response Organizations |
74 |
| |
8.2 Decentralization and Devolution of Disaster Management
- Experiences from India
|
74-76 |
| |
8.3 Responsibility of Preparation of Disaster preparedness
and Response Plans
|
76-77 |
| |
8.4 Emergency Response |
77-78 |
| |
8.5 Emergency Response by Local Authorities |
79 |
| |
8.6 Disaster Victim Identification (DVI) |
79 |
| |
8.7 Scope to be addressed in plans at different levels |
79-80 |
| |
8.8 Stakeholder Involvement in Disaster Preparedness |
80-81 |
| |
8.9 Arrangements for Equitable Distribution of Relief
and Recovery
|
82 |
| |
8.10 Special Community Recovery Modules |
82 |
| |
|
|
| Chapter 9 |
| 9 |
Protection of Public Infrastructure from Impacts of
Natural Disasters |
83 |
| |
9.1 Using Information on Multi-Hazard Risks to reduce
Vulnerabilities of Infrastructure |
83 |
| |
9.2 Risk Reduction Strategies |
84 |
| |
9.3 Existing Infrastructure |
84-85 |
| |
9.4 Future Development of Infrastructure |
86-87 |
| |
|
|
| Chapter 10 |
| 10 |
A National Public Education, Training and Community
Awareness Programme
|
88 |
| |
10.1 School Education - Incorporating Natural Disaster
Risk Management in School Curriculum
|
88-89 |
| |
University Education - Incorporating Disaster Risk
Management in University Education |
90-91 |
| |
10.3 Training |
91-92 |
| |
10.4 Public Awareness |
93-95 |
| |
10.5 The Mechanism for Implementing Training and Awareness |
95-96 |
| |
|
|
| Chapter 11 |
| 11 |
Role of different Stake holders |
97 |
| |
11.1 Private Sector |
97 |
| |
11.2 Volunteers |
98-99 |
| |
11.3 Role of Media in Natural Disaster Management |
100 |
| |
11.4 Non-Governmental Organizations |
101 |
| |
|
|
| Chapter 12 |
| 12 |
Conclusions and Summary of Recommendations |
102 |
| |
12.1 A Five-year Programme for Strengthening Disaster
Risk Management System in Sri Lanka |
102-103 |
| |
12.2 Resource mobilization and Partnership Strategy |
103-105 |
| |
12.3 Concluding Remarks |
105 |
| |
|
|
| Annex No. |
Annex Title |
| Annexure 2.1-I
|
Institutional Framework for National Disaster Management
|
| Annexure 2.1-II
|
Structure of National Level Response
|
| Annexure 2.3-I
|
Organization Structure of the Disaster Management Centre
|
| Annexure 2.3-II
|
Specific existing agencies / stakeholders that would be associated in different phases
|
| Annex 2.3-III
|
Disaster Risk Management (DRM) Functions and Responsibilities of Agencies
|
| Annex 2.3-IV
|
An Institutional Capacity Assessment – Natural Disaster Management under the Stock Taking DM in Sri Lanka by UNDP |
| Annex 3.3-I
|
Disaster Risk Assessment Process
|
| Annex 3.3-II
|
Technological Risk Assessment and Requirement Imposed in the US
|
| Annex 3.5-I
|
Hazard zonation mapping, scientific studies and investigations related to river floods, landslides, reservoir dam safety and coastal floods, and work presently done by different agencies
|
| Annex 3.5-II
|
Some Suggestions for Survey and research for future disaster mitigation
|
| Annex 5.2-I
|
Functions of Agencies in relation to Early Warning (Some are already in effect)
|
| Annex 5.2-II
|
Specific detailed activities for the agencies in early warning in different disaster situations
|
| Annex 5-2-III
|
Establishment of a 24 hour Operational natural disaster Early Warning System for Sri Lanka including capacity building
|
| Annex 5.3-I |
Preparation of Emergency Action Plans including Early Warning Systems for Dams
|
| Annex 5.4-I
|
National level Response Structure during Warning Stage
|
| Annex 5.4-II
|
Provincial level Response Structure during Warning Stage
|
| Annex 5.4-III
|
District Level Response Structure during Warning Stage
|
| Annex 6.3-I
|
Action Plan for Natural Disaster Management for Nawalapitiya Urban Council Area
|
| Annex 7.1-I
|
A Process for Mainstreaming of DRM in the National Development Process and some Possible Areas
|
| Annex 8.1-I
|
Members of National Disaster Management Committees at national, provincial, district and divisional levels
|
| Annex 8.3-I
|
Conformity of departmental, district, divisional, provincial and local level plans to the national level plans
|
| Annex 8.3-II
|
Jean-Pierre Massue , Risk reduction and disaster management in Sri Lanka : Local level disaster preparedness and emergency response, Colombo , 4th May 2005
|
| Annex 8.4-I
|
National Level Response Structure on Occurrence of a Disaster
|
| Annex 8.4-II
|
Provincial Level Response Structure on Occurrence of a Disaster
|
| Annex 8.4-III
|
District Level Response Structure on Occurrence of a Disaster
|
| Annex 8.4-IV
|
District level example of Activation of EOC and Vigilance
|
| Annex 8.7-I
|
Format of the Village Level Plan
|
| Annex 8.7-II
|
Coverage of Disaster Preparedness Plans at Other Levels
|
| Annex 8.8-I
|
Planning for Involvement of Community Based Organizations in the Initial Response
|
| Annex 8.8-II |
ACFID Code of Conduct For Non Government Development Organizations
|
| Annex 8.9-I
|
Report on Internally Displaced Persons in Sri Lanka in the context of the Tsunami Disaster
|
| Annex 9.2-I
|
Some Examples of Generic Mitigation Measures
|
| Annex 9.2-II
|
Land Planning and Land Use Measures
|
| Annex 9.2-III
|
Potential Impacts of Natural Hazards on Highways and Railways
|
| Annex 9.2-IV
|
Mitigation Measures for Water Supply Systems
|
| Annex 9.2-V
|
Mitigation Measures for Solid Waste
|
| Annex 9.2-VI
|
Potential effects of natural hazards on electricity generation and distribution
|
| Annex 9.2-VII
|
Mitigation Measures for electricity generation and distribution
|
| Annex 10.1-I
|
Risk Culture: Proposals on education and training: Jean-Pierre Massue, Colombo , May 2005
|
| Annex 10.5-I
|
Training and Awareness already conducted and Target Groups
|
| Annex 11.3-I
|
Media Mobilization Guidelines, A – Long Term: natural disaster prevention, preparedness, post disaster recovery at national and local level |
| Annex 11.3-II
|
Media Mobilization Guidelines, B – Short Term: natural disaster event, immediate response, social mobilization at national and local level |
| Annex 12.1-1
|
Five-year Programme for Strengthening Disaster Risk Management in Sri Lanka
|
| |
|
|
Additional Documents for reference
Appendices |
| Appendix I: |
Visits by the Parliament Select Committee – Local and Foreign |
| Appendix I-1 |
Foreign Visits |
|
| |
1 (a) Study Tour to Indonesia |
306-307
|
| |
1 (b) Study Tour to Australia |
308-315
|
| |
1 (c) Study Tour to Turkey & Germany |
316-331
|
| |
1 (d) Study Tour to Japan & Korea |
332-348
|
| |
1 (e) Study Tour to United States of America |
349-354
|
| Appendix 1 – 2 |
Local Visits |
|
| |
2 (a) Field Visit to Kandy |
355-356
|
| |
2 (b) Field Visit to Balapitiya, Hikkaduwa & Matara |
357-359
|
| |
2 (c) Field Visit to Ampara & Kalmune |
360
|
| |
|
|
| Additional Appendices |
A |
Statistics on Impact of Tsunami from
some districts |
361-381
|
B |
Agencies that attended and made submissions
at the Select Committee Meetings |
382-383
|
C |
List of personnel with whom the Committee had
Deliberations |
384-387
|
D |
Summarized Submissions of Representatives |
388-400
|
|
Poten |
Poten |
Executive Summary
What Sri Lanka learnt from the 26th December 2004 Tsunami
The experience of Tsunami of 26th December 2004 was that the people were taken unawares. It was a rare disaster, the characteristics of which were not known widely and people in Sri Lanka did not know what was happening. The most important lessons learnt were preparedness for events of this nature is vital and that all segments of population including the community and all levels of officials must be made aware of the peculiar characteristics of tsunami, and as this is a very rare occurrence it is important that the knowledge is passed on to the next generation.
The Parliament Select Committee consisting of 21 members from all political parties represented in Parliament, was appointed with Hon. Mahinda Samarasinghe, Chief opposition Whip of Parliament as the Chairman to investigate and recommend steps to ensure that an early warning system be put in place and other steps to minimize the damage caused by similar natural disasters. The Committee heard the evidence of relevant personnel, went on field visits and participated in several local and foreign study tours. Outcomes of these have been taken in to consideration in compiling this report.
Sri Lanka Disaster Management Act
The recommendations suggested in this report are in conformity with the Sri Lanka Disaster Management Act, No. 13 of 2005 certified on 13th May 2005. This Act provides for a framework for disaster risk management in Sri Lanka and addresses disaster management (DM) holistically, leading to a policy shift from response based mechanisms to a proactive approach toward DRM; and for establishment of Institutional and Legislative systems for a ‘legal’ framework for DRM. The fact that disaster management is a devolved subject as per the 13th Amendment of the Constitution has been considered and consequently the Chief Ministers of all Provincial Councils are included in the National Council for Disaster Management as members.
In the Act functions of the National Council for Disaster Management (indicated as Council or NCDM in this report) and Disaster Management Centre (DMC) have been listed. The DMC will carry out the designated function under the guidance of the Council.
Proposed National Mechanism for Disaster Risk Management
In conformity with the provisions of the Act, a National Mechanism for Disaster Risk Management is proposed with appropriate Institutional Framework for National Disaster Management and the Structure for National Level Response with EOCs at relevant levels.
In handling local disasters which are the more frequent ones in the country Provincial Councils and Local Authorities are to activate the provincial and local authority level EOCs to respond to emergency situations parallel to the district / division setup and similarly in long term actions for disaster mitigation to reduce the adverse impacts of disasters. Legal Powers as required by the 13th Amendment of the Constitution should be delegated to the Provincial Councils and consequently to the Local Authorities.
The Committee recommends to work towards establishing the proposed DMC within a specially created Disaster Management Ministry with a mission to create a culture of safety to reduce the vulnerability of the population to natural hazardous events in the future.
The proposed DRM system recommends that the DMC, acts as the focal point to strictly monitor and coordinate the components of the system with relevant existing agencies under the guidance of the Council. The present National Disaster Management Centre (NDMC) is to be restructured with legal powers to form the proposed DMC.
Five Year Programme for Strengthening Disaster Risk Management in Sri Lanka; and Resource mobilization and Partnership Strategy
The Committee proposes a Five-year Programme for Strengthening Disaster Risk Management System in Sri Lanka for implementation. Resource mobilization and Partnership Strategy for mobilizing national, regional and international resources and partnerships for disaster risk management is also proposed.
Key Reforms Suggested
Considering the inadequate disaster preparedness in the country at present as was evidenced in the December 2005 Tsunami, the Committee recommends the following key reforms in setting up the National Disaster Risk Management (DRM) Mechanism. The five year programme for establishing the system including these key reforms will lead to a new approach in managing natural disaster risks in Sri Lanka.
These reforms and other components of DRM are elaborated in detail in Chapter 3 through Chapter 11, in Part II of the report - Establishing the National Disaster Management System.
|
| 1 |
Systematic Multi-hazard Mapping and Disaster Risk Assessment – Apart from work done by NBRO on landslide hazard mapping relatively little is available on disaster risks. A Systematic Multi-hazard Mapping and Disaster Risk Assessment approach has been suggested. A special Hazard Mapping and Risk Assessment Unit is proposed within the DMC. Land Slide Studies Division (LSSD) of NBRO and also provide inputs to this centre. It also stresses the importance of deciding on priority areas for Risk Assessment based on criteria such as severely prone areas; importance of the sector – education, health, housing, and agriculture depending on the geographical area; and where presently development projects are being finalized for integrating at the initial stages of such projects. |
| 2 |
Systematic Data Collection, Research and Analysis Analysis - An approach is suggested for systematic data collection, Research and Analysis proposing a Data Collection Centre and a Research and Development Unit within the DMC. These will be special technical units, which should be headed and manned by skilled personnel. The report suggests a system to be devised using the equipments presently available but which were not of use at the time of the recent tsunami calamity. An inventory of past disaster impacts and a DRM Website are also proposed. |
| 3 |
Countrywide Disaster Early Warning System – The Committee considers that a powerful mechanism is required for coordination and working with relevant early warning agencies – international, regional and local considering the need for strengthening capacities of relevant local agencies covering early warning for weather related hazards, riverine floods, possible flooding downstream of reservoirs, possible landslides, coastal flooding/ storm surges and earthquakes and tsunamis/sea surges. Improvement of early warning dissemination systems is stressed. A study is suggested for getting recommendations on an appropriate cost effective comprehensive tsunami warning system.
|
| 4 |
Natural Disaster Mitigation Strategy for each level of Government - Mitigation activities to be carried out by relevant infrastructure and service providing agencies, local authorities and provincial council engineering divisions to be responsible for identifying mitigation projects that reduce disaster risk in a given area or a community including financial commitments. Local or donor funding may be used for such projects.
A multi-stakeholder mechanism at different levels must review such proposals and decide on priority projects considering the benefits to the communities and financial requirements.
|
| 5 |
Systems for integrating disaster risk concerns in development – It is imperative that disaster risk concerns are integrated in development. This includes integrating DRM in the National Development Process, introducing Codes and Guidelines for Planning and Construction in Disaster Prone Areas. A Building Technology Unit has been proposed as a division of the DMC with the aim of i.) Reviewing existing and developing new codes and guidelines, ii.) Taking action to adopt them legally and making them mandatory and iii.) Ensuring compliance. Land Use Zoning Based on Hazard Maps and Data Base of Lands indicating proneness to various hazards are proposed. Activities required by programmes of UN Agencies should receive attention.
With regard to the coastal area buffer zone the Council has made suitable recommendations. Recommendations have also been made on development controls by LAs and requirement of EIA for all large development projects. To reduce future disaster risks, specific mechanisms must be developed to incorporate disaster risk reduction in the planning processes of some of the key development sectors such as environment, water resources, power and energy, education and health.
|
| 6 |
Natural Disaster Preparedness and Response Planning for each level of Government - For each level of Government preparation of Disaster Preparedness and Response Plans, an Emergency Operating Centre (EOC) and Disaster Management Committees are to be made mandatory.
Local authorities are to be strengthened to improve their capacity to respond to disasters. DMC will coordinate and monitor preparedness of all levels of administration. Private sector agencies and communities also will be encouraged to prepare their plans. Departmental disaster preparedness plans including Standard Operation Procedures by service providing agencies at various levels would be related to technical activities of the department for recovery, emergency services, etc.
In Disaster Victim Identification (DVI) expertise lacking in Sri Lanka, Australia is willing to support through advanced courses in Canberra.
Preparedness and response plans will ensure stakeholder involvement in disaster preparedness and during emergency, such as various traders and others, community and CBOs, NGOs and media. Ministry of Social Welfare/ Department of Social Services must introduce a more effective system to register NGOs who can take on specific responsibilities in their specialized area of activity and entrust them with specific tasks.
Special community recovery modules are proposed to enable the communities to return to normalcy within the shortest possible time.
|
| 7 |
Arrangements for Equitable Distribution of Relief and Recovery - DMC must derive a formula for Equitable Distribution of Relief and Recovery, considering the proportion of population affected in different areas, especially in national scale disasters. Concerns of the Internally Displaced Populations (IDPs) as proposed by IOM are to be considered.
|
| 8 |
Protection of Public Infrastructure from Impacts of Natural Disasters - The two aspects to consider are protection of existing infrastructure, and designing and constructing new infrastructure to withstand the forces of the prevailing hazards, for which mitigation strategies and risk reduction strategies are suggested using information on multi-hazard risks.
The Committee stresses the importance of maintenance of existing infrastructure and hence the significance of timely fund allocations to be made for regular and periodic maintenance; and for repairs including hazard resistant measures to be built in as required by retrofitting. Also vital is the new infrastructure incorporating hazard mitigation measures at different stages of development.
|
| 9 |
A National Public Education, Training and Community Awareness Programme
Incorporate natural disaster risk management in school curriculum taking into consideration present activities already started and activities in proposal stage. A special activity proposed by the Committee is the « School Net Project » to train children to use internet system and as a tool for risk prevention awareness issues. The Environmental and Disaster Management Circles already initiated in schools can be utilised and further improved. To include risk awareness education, two elements that could be included are, i) risk awareness education of children at school level and ii) making schools safe from major accidents - with school safety plans.
For incorporating disaster risk management in university education to initiate and commence teaching within a period of 3 years; draw up a programme for integration in all relevant degree and PG level courses as compulsory and/or optional modules in all other courses in all universities; start PG Diploma and Masters Courses, and PhD studies in Disaster Management related subjects; promote projects, assignments and research work; seminars for dissemination of findings and research publication of selected work.
Continue the present training and public awareness programmes with improvements; target groups and specific training areas are identified in the report; the mechanism for implementing should take into account activities presently done by various agencies and newly identified agencies.
|
| 10 |
Development of Private Sector - to promote private sector to organize themselves in to associations with the Goal of "providing a forum for information exchange to enhance emergency preparedness and contingency planning within the business community". They must have their own plans for responding to disasters as well as for rapid recovery after a disaster. A similar organization is in existence and functioning in the City of Los Angeles in USA known as Business and Industry Council for Emergency Planning and Preparedness (BICEPP). The Ceylon Chamber of Commerce has also recently commenced action on steps to be taken in case of an earthquake.
|
| 11 |
Volunteers – The Committee recommends creating a culture of volunteerism to promote Emergency Management Volunteers at village, LA and division levels for assisting in emergencies. These groups will be registered by the relevant administration and training provided. In recruiting volunteers some consideration are, getting committed people from non-traditional sectors, including young people, culturally and linguistically diverse groups, and retired and semi-retired people, without any political bias and those wiling to provide their service irrespective of what political parties are in power at local, provincial or national level governing bodies. Lessons from Australia can be taken for organizing volunteers in a systematic manner.
|
| 12 |
Role of Media in Natural Disaster Management - Focus of media attention are, events which are of priority interest to each media organization’s own audience and shock effect of an immediate disaster situation. Aspects of media coverage depend on their operational capacity and news gathering strategy. Media Mobilisation Guidelines for Long Term and Short Term are proposed.
|
| 13 |
Role of Non-Governmental Organizations - NGOs active in the area of Disaster Management should be recognized and facilitated by government by registering and maintaining their details in a suitable format indicating types of their activity and their commitment in case of a disaster. It is recommended that a Code of Conduct similar to that used by AUSAID be developed for adoption. |
| |
|
|
|